Captain Comet writes...

1) Why the warworld didn't turn "phantom zone colors" ? Is this because of Klarion's magic ?
2) Wait so... Klarion can teleport a small planet ?!!??! Just like that ?
3) How did the Light capture kryptonians so easily, given they were trained for decades in the zone, yet it seemed easy for Vandal to master the phantom zone rules better than them...
4) Does Superman have longevity far superior to a regular human or does he ages like everybody else ?
5) If you've answered "yep" to question 2, I'll be a little frustrated. I wanted details about his powers limits.

Bretly writes...

Is Klarion's physical form really nine years old? He looks just as old as the other adults in the show,just wondering.

Verdragon writes...

Have you ever been given creative restrictions or an executive directive and thought 'okay, this will be a fun challenge to write around' or 'this means I'll just have to do something more obscure'? If so, any notable examples?

Anonymous writes...

How old is Blue Beetle? You have said multiple times that he was born in 1999 but in Season 3 him and Static were said to both be 18 on December 31, 2018.

walkie writes...

Hi,
I'm a huge fan of YJ, and seeing all of the recent criticism and praise about the show in regards to the representation of various faiths, sexualities, genders, etc particularly in the last 2 seasons, I had a few questions about your thought processes behind some of the choices you made with regards to it. I want to say that while I personally have a few quibbles with the way that some of it is done, its ultimately your show, and you're still doing a great job making it entertaining.

1. Do you feel like you've consciously "ramped up" representation of all of the things mentioned above (or at least visibility of them) in seasons 3 and 4? If so, why, or of not, why not?

2. Do you see a difference in representation that is interwoven into the ongoing story at hand and that which is not? Or do you consider the whole show to be one big story, so anything about anyone in the show is in your opinion relevant?
As an example, one of my minor personal quibbles with season 4 was the Violet stuff in episode 4x14, not because of the content of it, but because it seemed kind of out of nowhere and out of place and (so far) has led to nothing. I would personally contrast that to how you portrayed Native Americans in season 2, or even L'gann this season, where representing characters of different ethnicities and sexualities was interwoven into the story at hand, and particularly in the former, essential to not only the journey of that character, but the overarching plot as a whole. The fact that Violet, a character who represents a unique faith and gender is the character who we pulled away from the story to seemingly randomly focus on for half an episode seems to make that part of the show more of a PSA or educational aide than a part of the plot or character's journey, especially when you consider the content of the conversation.
3. Why Violet? There is a ton of other characters whose unique personalities or traits could have been highlighted, why was she specifically chosen, particularly when she was not a central character this season? I would also contrast that to Khalid and Zatara, whose tangents about their faiths were not only nicely symmetrical but also felt more organic and central to their characters and the decisions that they had made and would go on the make, which shaped the entire story of that arc. Obviously this is all my opinion, and my biases for or against certain characters probably shape it.

All of that said, I still think the show is great, and thanks for taking the time to read this.

Anonymous writes...

Try to keep in mind that people having such strong emotional reactions to the choices this show makes ultimately means that they’re passionate about it. People in all fandoms have meltdowns if they feel like something “let them down” i.e. the Game of Thrones and How I Met Your Mother finales. This is not personal towards you, even if it feels that way. I think you just make yourself far more accessible than the average creator with this forum and if it’s becoming too much then it might be time to set some boundaries.

Anonymous writes...

For Season 3, episode "Evolution", I have two questions -

1. Is there a name to the alien race controlled by Starro or should we just consider them an 'unknown alien race controlled by Starro"?

2. Based on the design of the armada ships, was that based off of something in the DC universe or formed by the creators and yourself?

3. If Savage failed to defeat Starro, could he have actually fallen under control of the creature?

4. Does the Starro creature have a gender?

5. Seeing Starro is contained in the stasis pod, is it actually dead? (But I understand if this is no spoilers answer)

Princeton writes...

Greg why was it decide as part of the plot of the young justice comic story Targets that during the beginning of the story young justice comic Targets that Garfield would still have his pictures of queen peridia on his phone if was decided that the ending of the story of the young justice comic Targets was going to be that Garfield was not get to back together with Perdita in a dating relationship?

Onomastics FTW writes...

I see many people asking about much of this, but they seem to all buy misunderstanding Kryptonian naming customs, so I'll ask it a bit differently.

Many are confused by the names Ursa Zod and Lara El. First, I understand what you're doing there, especially after the reveal of Kara Zor-El.

Clearly, Lara El's full name would be Lara Lor-Van El, or perhaps you've decided on Earth 16's Krypton women drop the father's name entirely. Either way, that explains the lack of a hyphen.

My questions are:
1) Which is it? Do they keep the father's name as a middle name, and just not say it all the time, or drop it all together? Or am I way off?
2) What was Ursa's father's name?
3) A little less directly related, does Non not have a house? If not, why? I realize this was the case in the comics, but I don't believe it was ever explained there, so I'd love to know how you'd explain it.
4) Not about names at all now, but I'm sidetracked on Non now: since Zod and Ursa were surprised to learn of the destruction of Krypton, it's clear they didn't have anything to do with Jor-El's predictions as they did during the New 52 era. This suggests Non also has a different backstory than that period (he doesn't have much of one at all right now, from what I can find). In that, he was Jor-El's teacher and was banished (and labotomized) for continuing to warn about the end of days after the Science Council forbade Non and Jor-El from doing so. It's clear that much of that doesn't work in your continuity, but how much of that is held over? If that's a spoiler request, I do apologize.

Riker writes...

Who takes care of Garfield logan's dog Wingman when beast boy is on outsiders missions?