
Ian> I'm going to go with everybody else and say that Goliath's sense of ethics provoked his reaction: to kill in the heat of battle is one thing, but cold-blooded, deliberate murder is unconscionable.
Essentially it is the Batman Question, with the same answer: killing the villain would end the story, and audiences also tend to get squeamish about heroes (true heroes, not just lead characters) who would jump to death as the easy solution. There's something too mercenary about that for audiences, so writers have to come up with a philosophical reasoning.
And also to impart morals to the young audience, hopefully in a better way.
Macbeth is "better" than Demona, but he has still been corrupted by the search for vengeance, sometimes because Demona's vendettas and fears have had consequences for him as well. Both Demona and Macbeth are at fault, and not meant to be cheered on. Goliath is the one who sticks with the lesson that the series is trying to teach, and so he is the one to be rooted for.
Pterobat - [incisivis@gmail.com]
posted @ Sun, Nov 18, 2012 10:40:24 pm EST from 174.3.224.115