It's a shame about the cinestory. It wasn't the kind of material I was looking for either but I did see two great advantages.
(1) Exposure. The problem we have now is that when the comics were first announced, the show had been off the air for eight years. Now it's been eight years since the last new material was released and twenty since the show was taken off the air. I think the "poisoned well" concern is a legitimate fear but by no means a certainty and, if you're drowning, I don't think it's worth getting too fussy about the next gulp of air.
(2) "A director's cut". A long-shot hope of course but eventually the cinecomics would have adapted episodes where Greg had ideas and even script pages for alternative/additional moments -- the Elisa/Jason scene in "Hunter's Moon", his tweaks to moments in "Grief" and "The Hound of Ulster". With a bit of photo editing, it would have been possible to put out something that stepped beyond the constraints of the original out which could have been fun.
At any rate, with the cinebooks canned and any work that was done towards them (there was clearly at least some as they commissioned a cover) presumably shelved, we return to the same holding pattern. But we seem to be approaching peak 90s nostalgia so it's quite a good time for the franchise's right situation to be uncomplicated.
The current best hope would seem to be the "Ducktales" reboot generating a Disney Afternoon revival -- ideally with new "Gargoyles" on TV but, at least, with comic titles riding the nostalgia wave.
The Ducktales comics (and other Disney comics) are currently with IDW. IDW would be an absolutely fantastic home for "Gargoyles" based off their other works -- in particular, the TMNT comics are fantastic and show a great and abiding love for the material and with the Sonic franchise they're expanding their retinue of 90s properties next year.
It's worth reading the interview linked below with IDW's CEO Greg Goldstein. If we're ever to persuade them that "Gargoyles" is a good fit for IDW, this is food for thought: "A lot of our properties are nostalgic, but they are the modern iteration. We are not basing our Turtles on cartoons from 30 years ago, we are basing them on the Turtles of today. Our Turtles have cell phones."
(Personally, I think this is a shame. I'd love to see the Turtles eventually restored to their 80s setting as I think it fits them hugely, much as Sherlock Holmes is usually depicted in the Victorian era - until recently anyway. But I'm not holding my breath.)
I wouldn't really want to see "the modern version" of "Gargoyles" as this would be a reboot of some kind possibly not involving Greg (although Eastman's involvement in the TMNT comics probably means they'd be respectful on that front). But perhaps 2198 would feel fresh enough to break down the door and create opportunity for more stories from the classic series later on, much as they've indicated an interest in potentially publishing new material in the Archie and Mirage universes if the creators were willing.
I've always hoped 2198 wouldn't feature in comics as it seemed the best placed to lead a TV revival and I probably, on balance, still think that. But it seems to me the clock is really starting to tick and the longer the 90s nostalgia wave continues without sign of a Gargoyles revival, the warmer I become towards the possibility of 2198 being the next comic franchise.
Ed
http://www.cbr.com/star-wars-adventures-idw-publishing-greg-goldstein-interview/
posted @ Sun, Oct 1, 2017 10:02:29 am EDT from 86.157.119.87