
Does anyone know what sources Greg is referring to when he says his research indicated there were rumors during Macbeth's reign that Lulach was, in fact, Macbeth's child and not Gillecoemgain's? He's mentioned this in a few places and said it was his reason for glossing over it and making Luach Macbeth's son in the series, for example:
https://www.s8.org/gargoyles/askgreg/search.php?qid=3503
https://www.s8.org/gargoyles/askgreg/search.php?qid=3481
https://www.s8.org/gargoyles/askgreg/search.php?qid=3464
https://www.s8.org/gargoyles/askgreg/search.php?qid=699
But I've never seen this in a historical source or history book. Most sources seem to take matter of factly that Lulach was Gillecoemgain's son, and very few primary sources from that time have survived, to the point that we basically only know Macbeth was a good king from analysis that's been done on an ancient poem and the fact that Macbeth visited Rome during his reign.
Furthermore, I'm not aware of any source which indicates Duncan hired Gillecoemgain to kill Macbeth's father, as it sounds like Greg is saying also came from his research in the above answers. This seems to be conjecture based on the fact that the Annals of Tigernach record Findlaech was killed by the sons of Mael Brigte (who would have included Gillecoemgain) and that the Annals of Ulster tell us Gillecoemgain was burned to death with 50 of his men (the assumption being that Macbeth did this in revenge).
Of course, I could always wait for questions to open up again and then submit the question to Greg and wait two years and hope he has the answer - but from the answers above, it seems like he's saying he got most of his information from Monique and Tuppence anyway.
Anyone here know?
Arlo
Gargoyles need not apply.
posted @ Sat, Jan 30, 2021 4:58:32 pm EST from 146.115.164.49