A Station Eight Fan Web Site

Gargoyles

The Phoenix Gate

Comment Room Archive

Comments for the week ending October 26, 2025

Index : Hide Images

Thanks to all the folks who have built up the GargWiki over the decades! It's truly one of the best fan resources around.
Craig

I looked back at the comment room for the week in 2006 that the GargWiki was released, and looked again at its announcements. I noted that the comments revealed that it was already using "real-life pictures" of historical figures involved in "Gargoyles" (such as the famous First Folio portrait of Shakespeare for the entry on him); it certainly tied in with all the historical background that has gotten into the GargWiki (one of my favorite parts of it).
Todd Jensen

Happy 19th Birthday to GargWiki! Lots of folks have been putting a lot of work into the Wiki these last few months (years! decades!), so go take a look!
Matt
"My daughter?! How dare you mock me! I have no daughter." - Demona, 1996

This day is called the Feast of Crispian;
He that outlives this day, and comes safe home,
Will stand a tip-toe when the day is named.
And rouse him at the name of Crispian.
He that shall see this day and live t'old age,
Will yearly on the vigil feast his neighbours,
And say "To-morrow is Saint Crispian":
Then will he strip his sleeve and show his scars
And say "These wounds I had on Crispin's day".
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot,
But he'll remember with advantages
What feats he did that day. Then shall our names,
Familiar in his mouth as household words
Harry the King, Bedford and Exeter,
Warwick and Talbot, Salisbury and Gloucester,
Be in their flowing cups freshly remembered.
This story shall the good man teach his son;
And Crispin Crispian shall ne'er go by,
From this day to the ending of the world,
But we in it shall be remember'd;
We few, we happy few, we band of brothers;
For he today that sheds his blood with me
Shall be my brother; be he ne'er so vile,
This day shall gentle his condition:
And gentlemen in England now abed
Shall think themselves accursed they were not here,
And hold their manhoods cheap whiles any speaks
That fought with us upon Saint Crispin's day.

Todd Jensen

Happy anniversary to all! It's great to be a part of this community at such a productive, exciting time for the property.
Craig

I was looking at the solicitation for the first issue of the "Gargoyles/Darkwing Duck" crossover at GargWiki, and noticed [SPOILER] a mention of New York's classic nickname, "the City that Never Sleeps". That's another of those nicknames that, once you come across it in a "Gargoyles" context, takes on a new feel - for, of course, the Manhattan clan do get regular sleep in the daytime. (The other such nickname was Japan's "the Land of the Rising Sun" - after it was mentioned in the solicitation for "Demona" #5, I found myself wondering how I'd never thought of it in the context of the Ishimura clan before - and it did seem to tie in with the scheduling of Taro's press conference - though that might have been just a coincidence. [/SPOILER]
Todd Jensen

A happy anniversary to all of us. I don't know how it works out this way that we seem to have a wealth of new material at the ends of the years, but it's terrific. Call it Halloween magnetism, maybe.

Craig > Huh. I'll admit I didn't go back and count, but if you did, good work. It's almost certain that the interspersion of the ads makes there seem to be more, and also maybe makes it feel like a shorter story than it is since the interruptions break it up slightly. (30 pages, hm? Wow.)

A five-hour train trip into the coalfields gave me a chance to take a second crack at that issue, and I did find it less daunting the second time around. I'll see if I can gather up my thoughts a bit in the next couple of days.

morrand - [morrand276 at gmail dot com]

I wish I can share a photo of the exact panel I'm talking about, but that lighting on Angelika from Demona #3 (Demona Angelika 1138 For Not Everything With Wings.png, if I must precisely specific) always makes my brain take a minute because it looks like Angelika has sunglasses on despite it being a rainy night in 1138 France.
ontheup&up2semanitcs

31 years. Wow, does time fly.

Todd> While I don't play Lorcana (I have plenty of hobbies already and I'm a little stretched for free time), I am impressed by the sheer number of properties they've been willing to cover. The House of Mouse itself doesn't give things like [i]The Black Cauldron{/i] any sort of attention and here's Ravensburger deciding to give everything a chance, not just the financially successful ones.

And with all the live-action remakes they do, you'd think a chance to redo "The Chronicles of Prydain" would be one of them.

Matthew the Fedora Guy
You're Gonna Carry That Weight

Hey all! I've been MIA for a couple weeks. Life got kinda crazy there for a while, but I'm going to try to catch up a bit.

Voices> Always nice to hear a new episode drop. I don't have a lot to note about this, but I enjoyed it. Crazy to think that Voices is wrapping up the World Tour! Been a long journey for sure.

Gargoyles/FF Crossover> As usual, I have not read anyone else's thoughts on this yet, so here are mine (very abridged and very late, but purely my own) [SPOILER] I'm sure I've expressed this before, but the whole idea of crossovers gives me a lot of mixed feelings. On the one hand, I want new CANON stories, not apocryphal stuff, and these stories feel a little, I dunno, "insubstantial?" for me because of that. On the other hand, I do think this story was fun (certainly a step up from most of TGC and the old Marvel stories) and I recognize what crossovers like this can do for the franchise, so I'm supportive. Anyway, with all of that in mind, I bought it (both digitally and in print version) and read it once or twice, but I haven't really delved into it too deeply as I would the canon stuff. A few things do pop out for me though.

- I like that the first few pages acknowledge that the "Age of Gargoyles" is fading away. I also think it is incredible that Angelika already has an apocryphal appearance. And I think that Demona, in her rage, having the frame of mind to strategically retreat from De Ablo was a bit surprising. Usually, she doesn't make good choices when she's mad.

- The "NOW" segments are fine and often fun. I particularly like the character of "The Gargoyle" and I think he is a natural addition to the Manhattan Clan in this crossover universe. I also really enjoyed the Xanatos and Stark interactions. I think it might've been fun if we were to discover that Diablo, in one of his attempts at creating an immortality elixir, was responsible for the creation of the Cauldron of Life. His experiments in using gargoyles to extend life seem to mesh well with the Cauldron. Oh well. I suppose this story was dense enough at it was.

-So, all in all, I found the story fun, but unlikely to be something I revisit too often. I'm glad it exists and I hope it is selling well and, more importantly, bringing in some new fans, but this sort of thing just isn't my cup of tea. That said, [/SPOILER]
I look forward to going back and reading all of your thoughts soon. And I look forward to Demona #4 in *checks calendar* 11 days, 13 hours, and 40 minutes.

Matt
"My daughter?! How dare you mock me! I have no daughter." - Demona, 1996

Sorry for the double post, but I just learned that the same Lorcana update that will introduce characters from "Gargoyles" will also feature "The Black Cauldron". Since I'd rather liked that movie, I found that a fun piece of news (and the two properties do have a few things in common, including a trio of witches and a magic cauldron).
Todd Jensen

PHOENICIAN - Thanks for the post. One thing we have which we didn't have last year (and probably weren't even expecting), a couple of crossovers (well, one half-released, the other on the way). How many of us last year were expecting the gargoyles to meet the Fantastic Four and Darkwing Duck (and with the latter crossover done via a team-up between Greg Weisman and Tad Stones, at that)? Not the same as canonical stories (which we're still getting), but certainly entertaining.
Todd Jensen

Happy anniversary of "Awakening: Part One"! We now enter our fourth decade with THIRTY-ONE years since Gargoyles' television premiere. Sure, the world premiere was celebrated last month, but this is the day I (and so many others) discovered the series, and it continues to be quite the adventure!

I checked back to last year's post, and was amused to find that we are in the exact same position in terms of which comics to anticipate: Two more from the latest story arc (last year it was Quest, this year it is Better Angels) and a Winter Special to cap off the year. I never want to grow complacent, but it is wonderful to acknowledge the routine we've established with Dynamite Entertainment. I don't mean to imply that there haven't been delays, only that we are about to enter our (hopefully) fourth year of new canonical stories, and I can't wait to see what's next!

To the the professionals who've work(ed) behind the scenes and the fans that experience(d) it all on the screens (and page), a happy Never the End!

Phoenician
Gus: "I always forget you're there." Hooty: "I forget I'm here toooooo."

A thought I had about "Demona" #4, coming up. (I've left out spoiler tags because the "Gargoyles"-related information in this post is entirely from the solicitation, which has been up long enough that I assume we've all read it.)

The solicitation reports that this is set in Constantinople in 1195. I looked up what was going on there at the time in real history, and learned that the same year, the then-Emperor, Isaac II, was deposed, imprisoned, and blinded by his brother Alexius, who then seized the throne as Alexius III. I wonder whether this event might play some role in the background of these events; obviously, neither the overthrown Emperor nor his deposer will be the murder victim, but they might be involved in the story in other ways.

(Alexius III's usurpation had major consequences for Constantinople, a few years later. Isaac's son - also named Alexius - got away and went about seeking help to free his father and recover the throne. He finally persuaded a Crusading expedition to help, promising to finance their Crusade in return; they came to Constantinople in 1204, defeated Alexius III, and freed Isaac, who became co-Emperor with his son. But they weren't able to pay the Crusaders, thanks to an almost-empty treasury (Alexius III helped himself to a lot of its contents before fleeing), which led to a fall-out with their former allies; the Crusaders sacked Constantinople in 1204 in return, an extremely destructive sack. Reading the descriptions of it, I'd say that Demona and Angelika would be well-advised to leave Constantinople and head elsewhere (we know they eventually wind up in Japan) before that time, and that any gargoyles still in Constantinople (whether serving in the Varangian Guard like Magni and Modi or having some other role) were likely smashed in their stone sleep during the sack. (Indeed, we know from the solicitation to #5 that Magni was dead by the events in it; might he indeed have been a casualty of the Fourth Crusade's sack of Constantinople?)

Todd Jensen

Only semi-related to Gargoyles but I recently stumbled on this vid going through all the wild and whacky variations of Loch Ness Monster sightings down thru the ages...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GKhSfH9OIK4

My personal fave is the "camel-monster" at about 3:15.

Algae
'Nuff said

Incidentally while I did get into Gargoyles first, got into the Marvel shows not too long after.

Also checked Bronx's first Chibiverse appearance and it's with a Fu-Dog (American Dragon Jake Long character who looks more like a regular dog).

Antiyonder

TOOD> IIRC Malekith in the comics has a lot of traditional fairy tropes associated with him, such as weakness to iron and being able to enslave mortals by tricking them into eating "faerie food". He's also leads the Marvel version of the Wild Hunt.
Algae
'Nuff said

Good point about no longer needing the spoilers; I used them because the Norse mythology comments grew out of [SPOILER] Demona's use of Gungnir's spear-head against Diablo [/SPOILER]. But since we've moved away from that by now, I think we can drop them.

There was a chapter on Malekith in the book; I'll have to reread it and see if I can spot the Celtic elements.

I once found a collection of "Tales of Asgard" as a paperback book, and recognized a few of the Norse myths adapted for it, such as the story about Thor trying to smash Hymir's cup.

Todd Jensen

TODD> (don't think spoilers are necessary here) That Thor and Loki: Epic Tales from Marvel Mythology sounds rather neat. Kinda reminds me of those old Tales of Asgard back-up strips Kirby and Lee used to do for the old issues of the Marvel Thor comics. They were basically adaptations of existing Norse myths mixed in with original tales of Thor's childhood adventures.

https://marvel.fandom.com/wiki/Tales_of_Asgard_Vol_1_1

Algae
'Nuff said

Todd> [SPOILER] I don't know if this needs spoilers anymore. Some of this has drifted pretty far from the Garg/FF comic.

The Frog Thor story is a classic from Walt Simonson, so much so that Marvel created another character just to play the role of a frog that has the power of Thor (incidentally they named the character Simon Walterson).

Now whether he was inspired by the Batrachomyomachia hasn't been confirmed but I did find a blog post interview where he talked about being inspired not just by the strangeness crafted by Lee and Kirby but also from animal fables, fairy tales and other transformation legends.

He even mentioned that Celtic myth was a big inspiration for the villain he created, Malekith the Accursed (a tyrannical Dark Elf from Svartalfheim). Plus he also created Beta Ray Bill, for reference an alien whose head resembles a horse skull but also is noble enough to wield Mjolnir with the same skill as Thor. And drew inspiration from Norse myth by having his people's home be a victim of Surtur the Fire Giant. [/SPOILER]

Matthew the Fedora Guy
You're Gonna Carry That Weight

Todd > I've seen a few reviews on reddit from the perspective of Marvel fans who are passingly familiar with Gargoyles, or who watched it as kids but haven't kept up. Not a lot, but a few. They've been mostly very positive. The only complaint I've seen is that [SPOILER] the story feels more like a general Marvel crossover than a specifically Fantastic Four crossover, since none of the team members have much of an arc...I expect that will change in the Dynamite crossover issue, given the solicitation description. [/SPOILER] I'd be curious to know how this issue sold in comparison to the Dynamite issues.
Craig

MATTHEW - [SPOILER] Thanks. I suppose, though, that Marvel never had Gungnir broken in half (though Wagner did, and thereby set a precedent).

Incidentally, Marvel recently came out with a retelling of the Norse myths - in printed text rather than graphic novel format - a somewhat oddball one that used for a framing device Thor and Loki telling the Avengers those same stories (Loki tells most of them, but Thor occasionally tells one; for example, he recounted the story of the building of the walls of Asgard, which led to Loki becoming Sleipnir's mother; Loki retaliated by telling how Thor had to disguise himself as Freya to recover his hammer from the giant Thrym). Most of the tales in it were the regular Norse myths (which showed a very strong influence from the d'Aulaires' "Norse Gods and Giants"), though they also included what were apparently a few retellings of Marvel stories about Thor and Loki, including an account of how Loki was responsible, in a way, for the Avengers (he was imprisoned on a remote island and decided to get Thor to come there by manipulating the Hulk into attacking a train, only to wind up unexpectedly getting not only Thor involved, but several other super-heroes as well), and another about Thor getting turned into a frog and helping the frogs of New York in a fight against the local rats (reading it, I wondered whether someone at Marvel had been inspired by the ancient Greek mock-epic about the war between the frogs and the mice). The book's titled "Thor and Loki: Epic Tales from Marvel Mythology", by Delilah S. Dawson. [/SPOILER]

Todd Jensen

Todd> [SPOILER] Yes, Gungnir has appeared in the comics, fairly frequently. In fact most of the weapons and relics of Norse myth have shown up in some form or another. Much like Thor's hammer Mjolnir, Gungnir is depicted as being made of the metal Uru. [/SPOILER]
Matthew the Fedora Guy
You're Gonna Carry That Weight

The comments/reviews of "Fantastic Four/Gargoyles" here, of course, have been from the point of view of "Gargoyles" fans with varying degrees of acquaintance with the Fantastic Four and other Marvel figures. But I wonder if there've been a few people, at least, who've read the crossover who were big Marvel/Fantastic Four fans but had little or no familiarity with "Gargoyles". It would be good to read their perspectives on it.

One other thought. [SPOILER] Demona used the spear-head of Gungnir to defeat Diablo. It struck me that here, in a "Gargoyles" crossover with Marvel properties, Demona wielded an object from Norse mythology - appropriate, given the prominent role Norse mythology has in Marvel (though there were no allusions to the Marvel take on the Norse myths in the issue - understandably, given that it'd be difficult, as people here have pointed out, to reconcile the Odin of "Gargoyles" with the Odin of Marvel). Though I wonder whether Gungnir ever got a mention in Marvel; Mjolnir features in it, obviously, but has Gungnir done the same? I've some mild familiarity with the Marvel take on Norse mythology - enough to know, for example, that in it, Thor and Loki are portrayed as rival siblings - but not enough to be able to answer that question. [/SPOILER]

Todd Jensen

Antiyonder: We do have a "Requested Images" section on the GargWiki's Community Portal. That's probably the more efficient space to discuss this :--)

Craig: My kickstarter order was mixed; some meant for me, some meant for others. So I don't expect a delivery anytime soon. But it is great to see others finally have their trades!

Phoenician
Gus: "I always forget you're there." Hooty: "I forget I'm here toooooo."

Sixth

So I've taken pics from shows and such officially uploaded onto YT.

So far just to share trivia (i.e. a show referencing another show or ip), so I was wondering if I maybe upload a pic onto GargWiki of Lexington's cameo on that Broken Karaoke video Sidekicks.

Best I can really do for pictures is a cellphone screenshot (No means of capturing pics from a TV or such).

But in the off chance it's good enough, I figure I could give a pic then for the other Gargoyles cast guest cameos. So, should I give the Sisekicks pic an upload?

Antiyonder

Fifth.

Funny that Todd mentions the advertising in the Fantastic Four/Gargoyles one-shot. I was just looking at the physical copy for the first time, and was making note of which ads Marvel chose to place (presumably indicating the properties where they felt they had the best chance of overlap with Gargoyles fans). There are a few Disney-themed ones: the Disney/Marvel "What If" mashup mentioned by Todd, as well as two Uncle Scrooge books. There are also ads for Epic Collection editions of the very earliest Fantastic Four and Avengers stories from the 1960s, a real "back to basics" approach at drawing in new readers. Most predominantly, there are several ads clearly targeted at a younger audience: a TPB of the cute kid-friendly character Jeff the Land Shark; the 'Mini Marvels' series (about child versions of the Marvel characters); and a series of Scholastic books with titles like 'Hulk Teach' and 'Days of Future Fun.' An ad for a Spider-Man collection is branded as "Perfect for Younger Readers," and even an ad for a Marvel Zombies entry is similarly billed as "Perfect for Younger Readers! Really!" It seems like Marvel is still viewing Gargoyles as a primarily kid-targeting property, which strikes me as an...interesting approach. It seems to me the audience is primarily adults at this point (although I can certainly understand that maybe they're hoping nostalgic parents will try to share the comics with their kids, as I've done with my nephew...so their perspective makes a little sense, I guess).

As to what morrand said last week about the amount of ads and the weight of the comic: the comic has the exact same amount of ads as the typical Dynamite issue (ten pages plus the cover ads), they're just distributed differently (being strewn throughout the story, instead of being put in at the end). That perhaps makes it SEEM like there are more, since you're seeing them constantly as you're flipping through the story. I find the Dynamite approach of putting the ads at the end classier and cleaner, although the Marvel approach certainly has a nostalgic pull for me as an old-school comics reader. The added heft you're feeling compared to the typical Dynamite issue is likely due simply to the fact that the story itself is longer (30pp. as opposed to the usual Dynamite 22pp.). To get REALLY into the weeds, the Dark Ages issues were the same 40-page length (including ads) as this F4 issue, and so were The Halloween Special and The Winter Special...and in fact, those probably feel heavier, since Dynamite has been using cardstock for the covers. BUT, those issues featured more ads than the F4 crossover does, so their stories made up slightly less of that 40-page length. In fact, the 30-page "Both Alike in Dignity..." is actually the longest single Gargoyles story we've gotten since WAY back in the very first SLG issue!

Yes, I'm a nerd. :)

In other comics-related news, I've seen that people are receiving their shipments of the Kickstarter TPBs finally. I backed the priciest option, so I imagine that will be some ways off for me. But has anyone in the Room received their books yet?

Craig

Thanks, Phoenician.

[SPOILER] I found it appropriate, incidentally, that the back of the comic had an advertisement for some re-imagining of various Marvel comics that Disney's been doing lately with classic Disney characters as the leads - like Mickey Mouse, Minnie Mouse, Goofy and Donald Duck becoming a "Fantastic Four" group. [/SPOILER]

Todd Jensen

Todd: [SPOILER] Yep. Not a local, but I was happy to walk across it when I visited the city for my second time in 2018.

Now, if the bridge in the background on the last panel of the last page is intended to be the Brooklyn Bridge . . . well, it's too far north. [/SPOILER]


Also, fourth.

Phoenician
Gus: "I always forget you're there." Hooty: "I forget I'm here toooooo."

A question for those more familiar with New York than I am. [SPOILER] Does the Brooklyn Bridge really have a "pedestrian walk", like the one in the just-released crossover where the Grey Gargoyle was turning all those people - including Brendan and Margot - to stone? [/SPOILER]
Todd Jensen

Third!
Algae
'Nuff said

Second
Phil

First.
Todd Jensen